microsoft office 365 business premium for 2 devices

#MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 BUSINESS PREMIUM FOR 2 DEVICES SOFTWARE#
#MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 BUSINESS PREMIUM FOR 2 DEVICES LICENSE#

The company I represent pretty much only uses Word & Excel on all the computers where O365 is installed. Well, Volume licensing doesn't even make sense unless you're like 250 users or more! What the heck is a smaller business user to do.

#MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 BUSINESS PREMIUM FOR 2 DEVICES SOFTWARE#

If you check the pricing for a small business to have say 100 individual users even at $8.25/month verses 20 'users' with software working on the same 100 different computers, the money difference is huge! However, let's say this business is trying to do things right so they look into somehow getting Microsoft to help them have everything legitimate. ) Then, over time or even right away, other 'Users' or Persons go on any particular one of those 5 machines, and 'they' are not 'THE' original 'user-person' it was installed under. Open VL is licensed per PC, not per User.Īt 10:20 AM post) You were the only person in this LONG string of comments that properly addressed the real issue for a small business where it gets installed on up to 5 machines under the 'ONE' Microsoft Account (which is basically some created email address ending in. Get a standard VL of Office with 11 licenses. If you have 11 computers and only need 11 email accounts (or less), but have 40 people, O365 isn't the way to go.

#MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 BUSINESS PREMIUM FOR 2 DEVICES LICENSE#

Yes, 40 users means 40 licenses because it's one email account and one user per license with O365. Last option is buying a box version, but then they lose all the online features, and if one person wants those, they would need a box version and 365 version. The Home version isn't licensed for business use. What if the user is just the manager of a group?

Do they now need 40 licenses for 11 computers? Then if it's 11 licenses that would be like a device license, but it allows up to 5 devices per user account. I have a client that will have more users than devices since they don't use the computers all day. If you look at the home version, MS says you can share it with up to 4 people in the same household. I don't see how that can be read as each user can share an account with other users. If each user has to have an account, each user needs an account. so much easier for rolling out.It is one to one. It's simply much easier to have MS Azure do all of the Active Directory synchronization and assign licenses that way. That said, all of our staff have their own unique licenses and accounts. In any case, while it seems logical that each person should have their own 'unique' user license and MS account, the actual licensing terms documentation doesn't seem to be so specific. This may sound like a stretch but these licensing docs are usually nailed down very tightly so this may not be an omission. It mentions that each user assigned a license must have a Microsoft account but it does not say the account needs to be unique or that the person to account needs to be a 1-to-1 relationship. The relevant licensing info seems to be on page 19.

Just to add to this thread, while I believe it may not be the main intent or even the original intent of the per user licensing scheme, the official Microsoft Terms of Use document doesn't seem to explicitly prohibit sharing a single user license with multiple people. So I'd agree with the above - in my inexpert opinion the 5 installs per account really represents 5 installs for a given individuals use, not for shared use. all of the individuals using 365 by definition have an account, and therefor a license so they are perfectly happy for you to have 5 user accounts and 100 shared accounts - as long there are only ever 5 fully licensed individuals using your 105 accounts.

you can theoretically have as many accounts as you like, as long as you have a CAL for every person who is going to access them.ģ65 is obviously different to some extent because you are allocating licensees to accounts but again I'd imagine that MS is envisaging a one to one mapping between the licenses and human users - which makes sense when you think about the relatively unrestricted way they let you make use of shared accounts, e.g.

They aren't always consistent about it but as I understand it when utilising user CALS in AD, on-prem exchange etc. Also worth noting that where MS are talking in per-user terms they often are talking about human beings rather than accounts.

Microsoft office 365 business premium for 2 devices